top of page
Search

Fish Amino Acids & Protein Hydrolysate as Biostimulants

Updated: Nov 14

Across several studies, experiments and practice-oriented reports, a consistent picture emerges: fish-derived amino acids and fish protein hydrolysates (FPH) act as biostimulants, but their benefits are strongly dose-, crop- and process-dependent. Let's take a closer look!


Effects on yield and biomass

The most robust yield data come from tomato and leafy vegetables, with additional early-growth evidence in cereals and legumes.


In tomato, soil-applied FPH at relatively low rates substantially boosts productivity. One trial using a fish protein hydrolysate as a soil drench found that a modest dose (around 0.5 mL per plant in 2 L of water) increased tomato yield by roughly half compared with untreated control plants, alongside clear gains in vegetative growth. Higher doses still promoted shoot biomass but started to compromise root development, underlining a narrow optimal window.


A more recent study using FPH derived from sardine processing waste tested both tomato and sorghum. Tomato showed a much stronger response: heights, biomass and yield-related traits all improved significantly versus control. Sorghum responded positively, but effects were more modest, emphasizing that broad-spectrum biostimulant claims don’t translate equally across crop types.


Leafy vegetables, particularly lettuce, benefit mainly through improved biomass and nutrient uptake. Field or greenhouse trials with composts and fertilizers enriched with fish by-products show higher leaf yield as well as increased leaf concentrations of macronutrients (N, P, K) and secondary minerals (Ca, Mg, Na). That combination—more biomass plus better mineral status—strongly supports the idea of fish-based inputs as yield and quality enhancers in leafy systems.


For maize and beans, the evidence is concentrated at the seedling stage rather than final yield. Trials using various fish-waste hydrolysates (guts only vs guts+heads, at 1–5% solution) generally show:

  • In maize: small improvements in plant height and seedling vigor; biomass changes are minor at early stages.

  • In beans: dramatic improvements at low dose (around 1% viscera-only hydrolysate), with plant height and seedling mass sharply higher than control, but rapid decline and even complete loss of germination at higher doses.


Overall, it seems that fish amino acids and fish protein hydrolysate offer clear positive yield/biomass effects at well-chosen low rates, especially in horticultural crops; strong crop specificity; and real risk of neutral or negative outcomes when formulations or doses are poorly optimized.


Product quality and nutritional aspects

Direct measurements of product quality in fish-FPH studies are more limited than yield data, but there are important signals:

  • Lettuce grown with fish-by-product composts not only produces higher biomass but also has higher leaf mineral content. This implies better nutritional quality for consumers (more nutrients per unit fresh weight) and potentially better plant health.

  • Tomato studies with fish-based products often report yield and growth, while detailed fruit composition (sugars, acids, vitamins, pigments) is less well documented. However, the broader protein hydrolysate literature—dominated by plant-based products—repeatedly finds improved vitamin C, carotenoids, and mineral content in fruits and vegetables. Given the similarity of mechanisms (amino acid supply, hormone-like activity), it is highly plausible that optimized fish-derived products can deliver similar quality benefits, even if the fish-specific dataset is still relatively thin.


So, the quality evidence is strong for mineral enrichment and suggestive but incomplete for more nuanced parameters like flavor, antioxidant capacity and shelf life. Mechanistically, though, there is no obvious reason fish-derived PHs would be inferior to plant-derived ones on these fronts.


Stress tolerance and seedling vigor

Where fish hydrolysates really shine in the existing literature is stress mitigation at early growth stages, particularly under low temperature.


A key set of experiments looked at beans and maize under cold stress (around 15/8 °C), comparing different fish hydrolysates at 1% and 10%:

  • In beans, a 1% dose of a specific hydrolysate markedly improved germination and increased seedling vigor index several-fold versus cold-stressed controls. However, higher doses (10%) often caused pronounced germination failure and morphological abnormalities.

  • In maize, the pattern flipped somewhat: 10% solutions of several hydrolysates gave the best germination and roughly tripled seedling vigor under cold conditions, whereas 1% solutions were less effective.


Other work with a silver-belly FPH (“DFH”) on legumes and okra under non-stress conditions echoes this dose–response pattern:

  • Low concentrations (around 0.1–0.5%) consistently increase germination percentage, root and shoot length, and seedling vigor indices—often doubling vigor compared with untreated controls.

  • High concentrations (around 2%) reduce germination and vigor, sometimes below control levels.


These findings show that fish-derived products can partially offset abiotic stress, especially cold, by enhancing germination, root growth and vigor. But they also highlight how steep the dose–response curve can be: the difference between “excellent” and “harmful” can be just a factor of 2–5 in concentration.


Mechanisms: why do fish-derived hydrolysates work?

Reviews that focus on composition give a coherent mechanistic picture:

  • Fish protein hydrolysates are rich in glutamic acid, proline, arginine and other amino acids linked to plant N metabolism and stress physiology.

  • Glutamic acid supports photosynthesis and fruit formation and is the precursor of proline.

  • Proline is a key osmoprotectant that accumulates under drought, salinity and temperature stress, stabilizing membranes and scavenging reactive oxygen species.

  • Arginine plays a role in nitrogen storage and signaling, potentially affecting growth and defense responses.


In addition, the peptide size and production method matters. Viscera-only hydrolysates often yield smaller peptides and higher antioxidant activity than those from mixed heads and guts, aligning with better performance in bean and maize trials. Enzymatic hydrolysis is generally preferred over chemical methods to avoid excessive salt loads and unnatural D-amino acids.


Mechanistically, fish-derived PHs appear to act through a combination of:

  • Supplying readily-assimilable organic nitrogen and micronutrients;

  • Modulating hormonal balances and metabolic pathways linked to growth and stress;

  • Enhancing antioxidant and osmoprotective systems.


Practical implications

Pulling all of this together:

  • Fish-derived amino acids and FPH function as true biostimulants, not just fertilizers, with demonstrated effects on yield, nutrient uptake, seedling vigor and stress tolerance.

  • Dose optimization is critical: most benefits occur at relatively low concentrations; higher rates can be neutral or clearly detrimental, especially for sensitive species.

  • Crop and formulation specificity is high: the same product and dose can strongly benefit one crop (tomato, lettuce, maize under cold) and underperform or harm another (beans at high dose).

  • The mechanistic basis — amino-acid/peptide signaling, improved N metabolism and antioxidant protection — is solid and aligns with broader protein hydrolysate literature.


From a development perspective, the existing evidence strongly supports fish-based hydrolysates as viable biostimulant platforms, especially when integrated into circular-economy concepts (valorizing fish by-products) and tailored carefully to crop and application context.


Sources

Join our mailing list – we'll occasionally send you updates on our projects and latest news!

Privacy Policy

INVENIRE LOGOT 2025.png

​doorbell[at]invenire.fi​

+358 40 8228 848​

Kokkilantie 835, 25230 ANGELNIEMI, FINLAND

  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
bottom of page